In the next four posts, we provide some blunt
musings about Covid-aware hygiene standards, especially national and industry-specific
standards. Come along with us for an untamed ride of nuance and perspective
through the wilderness of covidian concern.
*****
Musing #1: Industry-specific versus national
standards.
An educator in a previous post bemoaned the lack of national standards for cleaning
shared equipment in schools. I suspect he felt that local educational practices
were either insufficient, thinly followed, or poorly communicated. Thus he
pined for more and stricter guidance from on high.
I wonder if national or even
state standards are in fact superior to industry-specific and
location-contextualized standards? I am reminded by the complete lockdowns of
hair salons in California, while here in Colorado, salons go on about their
business in complete safety, following sensible safety standards—with no
resultant infections. Can bureaucrats, sitting at a distance, really make the
kinds of safety decisions that best fit a local educational community? I think not.
The CDC
recently posted the study results of a potential Covid spread in a Springfield,
Missouri hair salon. Two stylists, who subsequently serviced more than 139
patrons, were initially infected. After testing these paying customers, the CDC
found “all test results were negative”. Their conclusion? “Adherence to the
community’s and company’s face-covering policy likely mitigated spread of
SARS-CoV-2”. See the study summary for yourself. The bottom line is that I am
suspicious of state or national standards over the local or industry-specific
standards. Looking at the California
example, it is all-too-easy it is to overthink the situation and punitively
disconnect safety standards from actual science.