The Chinese case study introduced in last week's post provides both quantitative and qualitative findings.
Quantitative
Findings
At first blush, the
use of VR in teaching seems to have a positive effect on test scores: The
average score of the VR group was 93%, while the traditional instruction group
evidenced a 73% average. The lowest Score
of VR group was 75%, while the lowest score in the first post-test for the
traditional instruction group was 40%. In another measure, the VR group
demonstrated a 27.4% growth in scores.
Interestingly, the study spent
some time analyzing learning efficiency: only one student in the VR group required
repeated teaching and follow-up testing to achieve mastery, which, accounted
for 10% of the group members; in comparison, six students in traditional
teaching group required reteaching, accounting for 60% of those students.
According to the researchers, this suggests a certain level of spent-time learning
efficiency that advantages schools with limited resources.
The use of VR in
learning also appeared to offer positive results for knowledge retention. In
the second test, administered two weeks later, the average score of the VR
group approached 90%, while that of the traditional teaching group settled in
at 68%. According to the authors, this suggests that knowledge taught in a traditional
fashion is more inclined to be forgotten quickly.
The study also
unmasked, according to the researchers, an unexpected discovery: “The average
score of C students in the VR group reached 88%, 15.8% higher than that of the A
students in the control (traditional) group.” The researchers concluded: “Every
student has a special gift. As we found in the experiment, the right teaching
method helps to discover children’s unlimited potential.” Incidentally, past
U.S. technology studies in the arena of 3D learning and visualization harmonize
with this discovery: many technologies have a greater impact on struggling
students than they do on highly successful students.
In next week's post, we will uncover some of the qualitative
findings in this case study.
No comments:
Post a Comment